Questing to few admins.

Its something to the admins.

When an lower admin is online, he cant ban an hacker because he's a lower rank?
Why cant he ban him?
Its soo annoying that the lower admin can ban the hacker.
I can feel it by myself.
Iam not saying that you guys ARE gonna do something about it, Its your guys decision.

When an admin arent online, and the hackers are there.
I always need to lie, I say: TURN OFF YOUR HACKS, OR GET BANNED.
Then he says to me, My name arent on /admins. I said: Heard about Secret admin?
Then he said, SORRY. I will never in my life do it again.
As Aleksa_Studen, He was a hacker before, i said that.


PS: I hope you guys dont be mad on me.
And I really want someone of you BIG RANKS admin to answer on my application (ADMIN)
And if you guys now, Iam a big helper.
I Always online and such, NONE N00b.

Hmmmmmmmmm you are right !!
ban must be atleast for level 3 i dont say that for my self but level 3 must ba mximum i think but ban cant be in level 1 and 2 bec we still dont know if they are good or not

If we give ban out straight away how do we know we can trust them into just banning random people.

Yh it's annoying that lower level admins can't really do much with hackers however that's whats the report section is for.
If any other admins are not online report!

I suggest /tempban for a maximum of 2-3 days atleast.

Or wait to get promoted

For some reason I find it true that /warn or /kick should at least be there lol.

PK wrote:

For some reason I find it true that /warn or /kick should at least be there lol.

Its all to do with trust

Thats what ecaclty what i meant, we can't trust level 1 admin with massive commands like /ban
or have control over some lux admin stuff ect..

Earn your trust = promoted and get more commands, we all been there so work for it like the rest of the higher admins have

Alright Sir.

I was just asking.

Fidanza, Am not an admin.